Articles

  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-02.jpg?h=afa3cfa7&itok=QvEihQ2y
  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-03.jpg?h=452f395a&itok=o2eJpQ1X
  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-04.jpg?h=d85646e8&itok=e-zcRWuw
  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-05.jpg?h=eb90c5f1&itok=fmftIU1H
  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-06.jpg?h=f8567693&itok=OYoPjORc

OSHA Cranes & Derricks Updated Standard Goes into Effect November 2010

from Ted Schwartz, Safety Manager, WWW.HRIDEAS.COM

A long-awaited revised Crane & Derricks Standard is set to go into effect this year! The revised standard will comprehensively address key hazards related to cranes and derricks on construction worksites, including the four main causes of worker death and injury: electrocution, crushed by parts of the equipment, struck-by the equipment/load, and falls.

Attorney's Fees

By Sam K. Abdulaziz, Abdulaziz, Grossbart & Rudman

This is a case where the plaintiffs argued that the trial court needed to explain its award of attorney’s fees to show that there was a reasonable basis for them.  The plaintiffs also argued that the trial court did not award them enough attorney’s fees and costs against their former general contractor. 

Tassajara Development Corporation (the contractor) entered into a written contract to become the general contractor for a residential construction for the plaintiffs Gorman & Cheng (husband and wife).

Subscribe to Articles