Articles

  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-02.jpg?h=afa3cfa7&itok=QvEihQ2y
  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-03.jpg?h=452f395a&itok=o2eJpQ1X
  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-04.jpg?h=d85646e8&itok=e-zcRWuw
  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-05.jpg?h=eb90c5f1&itok=fmftIU1H
  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-06.jpg?h=f8567693&itok=OYoPjORc

California Supreme Court: Employers Need Not Police Meal Breaks


By Roger M. Mason, Esq. and Scott A. Mangum, Esq., SWEENEY, MASON, WILSON & BOSOMWORTH

This morning, the California Supreme Court issued its long awaited decision in Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. Superior Court (Supreme Court Case No. S166350).  The case is one of a number of class action lawsuits pending in California in which plaintiffs claim that their employers failed to adequately provide them with rest and meal breaks as required by law.

Subscribe to Articles