Articles

  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-02.jpg?h=afa3cfa7&itok=QvEihQ2y
  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-03.jpg?h=452f395a&itok=o2eJpQ1X
  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-04.jpg?h=d85646e8&itok=e-zcRWuw
  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-05.jpg?h=eb90c5f1&itok=fmftIU1H
  • /sites/default/files/styles/cover/public/cover/random/2017-11/cover-pic-06.jpg?h=f8567693&itok=OYoPjORc

Kalb's Q&A for Contractors

While I can guide you through the complexities of California contractor’s licensing, only you can gain the experience necessary for success. How much of that work will be accepted is always the call of CSLB staff as more than one contractor has discovered…
 
Q:  I have a “C-27” license and applied for a General Building “B”.  The Contractors Board rejected my application saying I did not have the proper experience.  Would you look over what I sent them and tell me why this work doesn’t qualify me for a General Building license?  Is the CSLB right?
 

CA Supreme Court: Subcontractors Must Reimburse Developer for Defense Costs

On July 21, 2008 the California Supreme Court issued its long awaited decision in Kirk Crawford v. Weather Shield Manufacturing, Inc. and held that under pre-2006 “Type I” indemnity clauses for residential construction projects construction subcontractors must indemnify developers for defense costs even when the subcontractor is not found to be at fault or negligent on the underlying claim.
Subscribe to Articles